World Parkinson's Day 2026: TaVNS Supports Moving Better and Living Fuller

The Scale of the Challenge

Every April 11, the world pauses to recognize Parkinson's disease (PD) — a condition that touches millions of families across every continent. The numbers alone tell a sobering story. PD is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder globally, and its prevalence is rising faster than any other neurological disease. A 2024 Lancet analysis estimated that approximately 11.77 million people are currently living with PD worldwide, with projections exceeding 25.2 million by 2050 as global populations age. In the United States alone, nearly one million people carry a PD diagnosis, with roughly 90,000 new cases identified each year.

Beyond the statistics lie real people: individuals who struggle to button a shirt, who hesitate before every step, who fear the day their voice becomes too soft to be heard. World Parkinson's Day is our opportunity to learn, to advocate — and to act.


What Is Parkinson's Disease?

Motor Symptoms

PD is classically recognized by four cardinal motor features: resting tremor, bradykinesia (slowness of movement), rigidity, and postural instability. These symptoms reflect the progressive loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) — a small but vital region of the midbrain responsible for coordinating smooth, purposeful movement. As disease progresses, many patients develop gait impairments — shuffling steps, reduced stride length, and freezing of gait — which are among the most disabling manifestations and a leading cause of falls.

Non-Motor Symptoms

PD is far more than a movement disorder. Non-motor features — including depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances, olfactory loss, constipation, fatigue, and cognitive decline — frequently precede motor symptoms by years and profoundly affect quality of life. Depression affects up to 40% of patients, cognitive impairment progresses to dementia in up to 80% over the disease course, and gastrointestinal dysfunction is present in the vast majority of PD patients.

Pathogenesis: More Than Just Dopamine

The hallmark pathology of PD is the abnormal aggregation of the protein α-synuclein into Lewy bodies within neurons, triggering a toxic cascade that spreads progressively through the nervous system. This neurodegenerative process involves mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired autophagy, oxidative stress, and — critically — chronic neuroinflammation driven by activated microglia and elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6. A 2016 meta-analysis confirmed that peripheral blood levels of IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-α, RANTES, and hsCRP are consistently elevated in PD patients compared with healthy controls.

The influential Braak staging hypothesis proposes that α-synuclein pathology does not begin in the substantia nigra but originates in the enteric nervous system and lower brainstem — specifically the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve (DMNV) — and spreads in a caudo-rostral pattern toward the midbrain and cortex. Animal studies have confirmed that pathological α-synuclein injected into gut regions richly innervated by the vagus nerve propagates to the DMNV, locus coeruleus (LC), substantia nigra, and cortex — and that vagotomy prevents this spread. Epidemiological evidence supports this mechanism: large population studies found that patients who had undergone truncal vagotomy showed a significantly lower subsequent risk of developing PD.


The Vagus Nerve: A Critical Player in PD

Anatomy and Multi-System Connections

The vagus nerve (cranial nerve X) is the body's primary parasympathetic highway — a bidirectional channel connecting the brainstem to the heart, lungs, gastrointestinal tract, spleen, and liver. It consists of approximately 80% sensory (afferent) fibers that relay peripheral signals to the brain, and 20% motor (efferent) fibers. Its afferent projections reach the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), which in turn projects to the locus coeruleus (LC), amygdala, thalamus, hypothalamus, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex — regions heavily implicated in PD pathology.

Autonomic dysfunction is present in virtually all PD patients. High-resolution ultrasound studies have revealed reduced vagus nerve cross-sectional area correlating with PD symptom severity, and post-mortem studies consistently report degeneration of the DMNV and NTS in PD brains.

The Cholinergic Anti-Inflammatory Reflex

One of the most compelling links between the vagus nerve and PD lies in its anti-inflammatory function. The DMNV is the primary source of acetylcholine (ACh) in the brainstem; vagal efferents release ACh that binds to α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (α7nAChRs) on microglia, macrophages, and immune cells in the spleen, suppressing the release of TNF-α, IL-1β, and other pro-inflammatory cytokines — a pathway known as the cholinergic anti-inflammatory reflex. Since neuroinflammation is both a cause and consequence of dopaminergic neurodegeneration in PD, stimulating this pathway represents a mechanistically rational therapeutic strategy.

The LC-NE Connection

The vagus nerve also modulates the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system. Loss of LC-NE neurons is one of the earliest events in PD — preceding substantia nigra neurodegeneration — and is strongly linked to early cognitive dysfunction and sensitization of dopaminergic neurons to further damage. VNS activates the NTS, which projects to the LC and increases norepinephrine (NE) output in prefrontal and striatal regions, providing neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory benefits through LC-NE-mediated suppression of microglial activation.


taVNS: Non-Invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease

What Is taVNS?

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) delivers electrical stimulation to the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (ABVN) — accessible at the cymba conchae and tragus of the outer ear — without any surgical implantation. The ABVN is the only peripheral branch of the vagus nerve accessible through the skin, making this auricular site uniquely suited for non-invasive neuromodulation. Compared to implanted cervical VNS, taVNS carries no surgical risk, no hospitalization, and allows home-based treatment — substantially expanding the population of patients who can benefit.

Mechanisms of Action in PD

The therapeutic rationale for taVNS in PD operates through multiple interconnected mechanisms:

1. Anti-neuroinflammatory effects via α7nAChR activation. In a 6-OHDA rat model of PD, auricular VNS (aVNS) significantly reduced TNF-α and IL-1β levels in the ventral midbrain, upregulated α7nAChR protein expression, and protected TH-positive dopaminergic neurons in the SNpc. Neuroinflammatory markers (GFAP-positive astrocytes and Iba-1-positive microglia) in the substantia nigra and LC were reduced to levels comparable to unlesioned controls following VNS.

2. Neuroprotection of dopaminergic and noradrenergic neurons. VNS significantly increased the number of TH-positive neurons in both the LC and SNpc of PD-model rats, attenuated striatal dopaminergic fiber loss, and reduced intrasomal α-synuclein accumulation within surviving TH-positive neurons. Importantly, these neuroprotective effects were frequency-dependent: high-frequency microburst VNS (300 Hz, 10 pulses/burst) provided the greatest preservation of LC-NE and SN-DA neurons, the most extensive reduction of neuroinflammation, and the strongest behavioral improvement compared to standard (20 Hz) or low-frequency (10 Hz) paradigms.

3. Immune rebalancing: Th17/Treg modulation. aVNS treatment in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats shifted the CD4+ T-cell balance toward regulatory T cells (Treg) and away from pro-inflammatory Th17 cells — a potentially disease-modifying immune effect.

4. LC-NE upregulation and neuroplasticity. VNS increases NE concentrations in the prefrontal cortex and upregulates BDNF gene expression in the brain, promoting neuroplasticity and neuroprotection in LC-NE target regions.

5. Modulation of motor networks. Neuroimaging and electrophysiological studies indicate that taVNS strengthens fronto-striatal and sensorimotor connectivity, reduces pathological β-band synchronization in basal ganglia circuits, and engages the NTS-LC-cortical axis to support motor rhythm and gait amplitude.


Clinical Evidence: RCTs and Meta-Analysis

The 2026 Landmark Meta-Analysis

The most comprehensive synthesis of clinical evidence to date was published in the Journal of Neurology in 2026. This systematic review and meta-analysis — conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered prospectively in PROSPERO — identified 7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) encompassing 183 participants with PD. All included studies used sham-controlled designs, with stimulation frequencies of 20–25 Hz, durations of 30 min/day, and treatment periods of 2–4 weeks.

The key findings were:

Motor function (MDS-UPDRS Part III): Pooled analysis of 6 RCTs (150 participants) demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in motor symptoms in the taVNS group compared to sham control (mean difference [MD] = −2.64 points, 95% CI: −4.23 to −1.05, p = 0.001). Heterogeneity was negligible (I² = 0.0%), and results were robust across all sensitivity analyses.

Stride length: Pooled analysis of 4 RCTs (83 participants) showed a significant improvement in stride length favoring taVNS (MD = +0.13 m / 13 cm, 95% CI: 0.05–0.22, p = 0.001). This improvement approaches or exceeds the published minimal clinically important difference (MCID ~3.6 cm for step length) in PD.

Gait speed: No significant group difference was observed (MD = 0.16 m/s, p = 0.07), likely reflecting methodological heterogeneity across assessment tools and the multifactorial determinants of gait speed in PD.

Safety: Across all included trials, no serious adverse events were reported. Minor side effects (transient ear discomfort, tingling, mild headache) were infrequent. The GRADE certainty of evidence was rated moderate for MDS-UPDRS Part III and stride length, with imprecision from small sample sizes being the primary limiting factor.

Highlighted Individual RCTs

Lench et al. (2023) conducted a double-blind, sham-controlled RCT at the Medical University of South Carolina enrolling 30 participants with mild-to-moderate PD. Participants received 10 sessions of taVNS over 2 weeks (25 Hz, 500 µs pulse width, 30 min/day, 20% above sensory threshold). taVNS was demonstrated to be feasible and safe, with no major adverse events. The study noted that daily in-office visits were burdensome, underscoring the importance of at-home device designs for future trials.

Marano et al. (2022) published in Movement Disorders a small Italian RCT (n = 12) demonstrating that a 2-week taVNS protocol (20 Hz, 30 min/day) produced significant improvements in both stride length and reaction time compared to sham stimulation in PD patients, assessed using a validated gait analysis system.

Marano et al. (2024) extended this work, showing that left-sided taVNS modulated contralateral subthalamic nucleus power, consistent with a top-down motor network mechanism underlying gait improvement.

Mondal et al. (2024), conducted in the United Kingdom (n = 36), assessed 4 weeks of taVNS (25 Hz, 30 min/day) and additionally measured molecular biomarkers of neuroinflammation in blood, providing translational validation of the anti-inflammatory mechanism observed in preclinical models.

Zhang et al. (2023), conducted in China (n = 22), evaluated taVNS (20 Hz, 30 min/day, 2 weeks) with wearable inertial measurement unit (IMU) assessment of gait, reporting improvements in both stride length and gait speed.

Sigurdsson et al. (2025), conducted in the United Kingdom (n = 33), was a rigorous double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled proof-of-concept trial using the Zeno instrumented walkway system (Protokinetics) for objective gait quantification over 3 weeks, contributing high-quality spatiotemporal gait data to the meta-analysis evidence base.

Commonly Used taVNS Parameters in PD Research

Based on the studies included in the 2026 meta-analysis and broader published literature, the following parameters represent the current clinical consensus range for taVNS in PD:

  • Stimulation site: Cymba conchae or tragus (left ear preferred)
  • Frequency: 20–25 Hz
  • Pulse width: 200–500 µs
  • Current intensity: Individualized to sensory perception threshold (typically 50–100% above threshold); typically 0.5–2 mA
  • Session duration: 30 minutes per day
  • Treatment duration: 2–4 weeks for acute trials; longer durations needed for sustained effects
  • Waveform: Biphasic rectangular pulses

Parameter optimization — particularly for pulse frequency, waveform shape, and laterality — remains an active area of investigation. Preclinical evidence suggests that higher-frequency microburst paradigms may yield superior neuroprotective effects, while human tolerability and safety considerations guide clinical parameter selection.


ZenoWell & BrainClos: Our Commitment to Parkinson's Care

At ZenoWell, we believe that every person living with Parkinson's disease deserves access to the most innovative, evidence-based, and compassionate neuromodulation care available. taVNS sits at the intersection of neuroscience and wearable technology — a non-invasive, drug-free tool with growing clinical evidence and an outstanding safety profile.

We are honored to be part of this scientific journey. We are especially excited to share that our research-grade closed-loop taVNS system, BrainCLOS — featuring respiration-gated taVNS delivery synchronized to the patient's own breathing cycle — has just completed a study investigating its potential to improve Parkinson's-related outcomes. Our manuscript was submitted in March 2026. Respiratory-gated taVNS represents a significant advance over conventional open-loop stimulation: by delivering taVNS preferentially during exhalation, BrainCLOS maximizes central nervous system engagement while minimizing unnecessary stimulation burden.

Once published, we will share the full findings with our community through an exclusive email campaign. Stay tuned.

In the meantime, our team remains committed to supporting patients, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers navigating this disease. Whether you are newly diagnosed, a long-time PD warrior, or a clinician seeking novel adjunctive tools — ZenoWell is here to support your journey.


References

  1. GBD 2021 Parkinson's Disease Collaborators. (2025). Projections for prevalence of Parkinson's disease and its driving factors in 195 countries and territories to 2050: Modelling study of Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. BMJ, 388, e080952. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-080952
  2. Parkinson's Foundation. (2024). Statistics. https://www.parkinson.org/understanding-parkinsons/statistic
  3. Willis, A. W., Schootman, M., Evanoff, B. A., et al. (2022). Updated estimates of incidence of Parkinson's disease in the United States. npj Parkinson's Disease, 8, 170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-022-00410-y
  4. The Lancet Parkinson's Series (2024). https://www.thelancet.com/series/parkinsons-disease
  5. Farrand, A. Q., Helke, K. L., Gregory, R. A., Gooz, M., Hinson, V. K., & Boger, H. A. (2017). Vagus nerve stimulation improves locomotion and neuronal populations in a model of Parkinson's disease. Brain Stimulation, 10(6), 1045–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.08.008
  6. Farrand, A. Q., Verner, R. S., McGuire, R. M., Helke, K. L., Hinson, V. K., & Boger, H. A. (2020). Differential effects of vagus nerve stimulation paradigms guide clinical development for Parkinson's disease. Brain Stimulation, 13(5), 1323–1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2020.06.078
  7. Jiang, Y., Cao, Z., Ma, H., Wang, G., Wang, X., Wang, Z., & Wang, J. (2018). Auricular vagus nerve stimulation exerts anti-inflammatory effects and immune regulatory function in a 6-OHDA model of Parkinson's disease. Neurochemical Research, 43(11), 2155–2164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-018-2639-1
  8. Lench, D. H., Turner, T. H., McLeod, C., Boger, H. A., Lovera, L., Heidelberg, L., Elm, J., Phan, A., Badran, B. W., & Hinson, V. K. (2023). Multi-session transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for Parkinson's disease: Evaluating feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy. Frontiers in Neurology, 14, 1210103. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1210103
  9. Liu, T.-W., Chen, C.-M., & Chang, K.-H. (2022). Biomarker of neuroinflammation in Parkinson's disease. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(8), 4148. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23084148
  10. Marano, M., Anzini, G., Musumeci, G., Bressi, F., Calandrelli, R., Della Marca, G., Fasano, A., & Di Lazzaro, V. (2022). Transcutaneous auricular vagus stimulation improves gait and reaction time in Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders, 37(10), 2163–2164. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.29187
  11. Mondal, B., Choudhury, S., Banerjee, R., et al. (2024). Effects of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation on clinical symptoms and molecular biomarkers in Parkinson's disease. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 15, 1331575. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1331575
  12. Sigurdsson, H. P., Hunter, H., Alcock, L., et al. (2025). Feasibility, safety and efficacy of multi-dose vagus nerve stimulation in Parkinson's disease: A double-blind, randomised sham-controlled proof-of-concept study. Journal of Neurology, 272, 684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12684-8
  13. Sigurdsson, H. P., Raw, R., Hunter, H., Baker, M. R., Taylor, J.-P., Rochester, L., & Yarnall, A. J. (2021). Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation in Parkinson's disease: Current status and future prospects. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 18(10), 971–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2021.1969913
  14. Wang, Y., et al. (2021). Vagus nerve stimulation in brain diseases: Therapeutic applications and biological mechanism. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, 631718. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.631718
  15. Zhang, H., Cao, X. Y., Wang, L. N., et al. (2023). Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation improves gait and cortical activity in Parkinson's disease: A pilot randomized study. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, 29(12), 3889–3900. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.14327
  16. [Meta-analysis]: Liu, C., Li, H., Zhang, Y., Gao, Q., Zhang, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2026). Effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on motor function and gait in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Neurology, 273, 196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-026-13738-9

Related Posts

Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Rheumatoid Arthritis:What Research Shows About This Emerging Treatment

Vagus nerve stimulation for rheumatoid arthritis is no longer only a laboratory idea, but the answer depends on the device. In the United States,...
發表者 ZhangLi
Oct 29 2026

World Bipolar Day: How Vagus Nerve Stimulation May Support Better Mental Health

March 30 marks World Bipolar Day and also the birthday of Vincent van Gogh. This coincidence offers more than a symbolic moment. It invites us...
發表者 Dr. XIAOJane
Oct 27 2026

研究前沿|迷走神經刺激器植入後的大型語言模型縱向症狀追蹤

簡介 植入迷走神經刺激(VNS)裝置後,患者狀況隨時間的變化通常會記錄在臨床紀錄中。這些紀錄可能描述患者在個別就診時的癲癇發作、情緒或疼痛。然而,由於紀錄格式缺乏結構,若要系統性比較數年間的變化,會相當困難。 2026 年發表於 JAMIA Open 的一項研究,評估大型語言模型(LLM)是否能從臨床紀錄中擷取症狀和嚴重程度評分,以建立患者層級的縱向變化軌跡。研究的主要重點,是評估一種臨床資訊擷取方法的表現。由此產生的變化軌跡,也初步呈現了患者之間的差異。 背景 臨床紀錄的限制 臨床紀錄必須區分「明確記載為不存在的症狀」與「未被提及的症狀」。前者表示該次就診曾進行相關評估;後者則不提供任何有關症狀狀態的資訊。紀錄中也可能提到某項持續存在的症狀,但沒有足夠細節可以判定其嚴重程度。如果把所有這類紀錄都分類為症狀不存在,就會在縱向變化估計中引入錯誤。 標準化量表可以提供一致的症狀評估,但不一定會在每次例行就診時完成。因此,研究人員檢視了是否能從現有臨床紀錄中可靠地擷取症狀,並追蹤其隨時間的變化。在使用這些紀錄進行更詳細的縱向分析之前,這是必要的方法學步驟。 方法 症狀擷取與嚴重程度分類 研究人員建立了 5 個資料集,共包括 95 名患者和 1,427 份由人工標註的臨床紀錄。訓練資料主要來自與 COVID 相關的紀錄,並加入接受 VNS 或其他手術照護患者的額外紀錄。資料以患者為單位,分為訓練集(58...
發表者 Dr. XIAOJane
Oct 23 2026

SPARC 十年歷程與超過 3.5 億美元資助:從神經定位到精準迷走神經調節

簡介 心跳、胃腸蠕動與膀胱充盈,都受到自律神經系統調節。研究人員希望透過電刺激影響神經活動,為器官功能障礙開發新的介入方式。然而,要準確地將刺激導向與疾病相關的神經纖維,並產生可重複的器官反應,仍需要回答幾個具體問題。神經會投射到哪些位置?不同個體之間的差異有多大?刺激後哪些功能會改變?又要如何及時偵測刺激目標以外的影響? 2026 年,Bhavesh Patel 及其同事在 Bioelectronic Medicine 發表綜述,整理美國國立衛生研究院(NIH)Stimulating Peripheral Activity to Relieve Conditions(SPARC)計畫的主要成果。該計畫於 2015 年啟動,向近 100 個研究項目提供超過 3.5 億美元資助,並促成 500 多篇出版物。 這篇綜述說明,神經圖譜、科技工具與開放資源如何共同支持精準神經調節。文章也指出,將基礎研究轉化為臨床應用時,仍然存在許多挑戰。 精準神經調節的主要挑戰 迷走神經將大腦與多個內部器官連接起來,是生物電子醫學的重要目標。然而,單一神經內含有走向與功能不同的神經纖維,因此刺激可能同時影響目標器官與其他生理過程。電極放置位置、神經束組織方式與刺激參數,會共同決定哪些神經纖維被招募。...
發表者 Dr. XIAOJane
Oct 23 2026

迷走神經刺激療法中,TENS貼片該貼在哪裡?

TENS 貼片該貼在哪裡才能刺激迷走神經? 如果你正在找 TENS 貼片該貼在哪裡才能刺激迷走神經,直接的回答是:不要把一般 TENS 貼片貼在脖子前方或側面。頸部包含頸動脈竇與主要神經,未經規範的電刺激可能對它們造成危險影響。對於非侵入性迷走神經刺激,最常被討論的做法是耳部刺激,也稱為 taVNS(經皮耳部迷走神經刺激)。不過,標準方形 TENS 貼片並不適合耳朵——耳朵彎曲的解剖構造需要耳夾電極或專為耳朵設計的形式。相關的耳部區域包括耳屏、耳甲艇與耳甲腔。如果你想要更簡單、更可靠、不必自行摸索的日常流程,專為耳部穿戴設計的 taVNS 裝置,例如 ZenoWell Vita 或 ZenoWell Luna,可能比硬把標準 TENS 機改裝上去更好。 主要擺放區域:耳部迷走神經刺激 如果你的目標是刺激迷走神經——無論是透過 TENS 機、耳夾,還是專用裝置——最實用且最有實證支持的做法,就是耳部迷走神經刺激,也稱為 taVNS。...
發表者 Dr. XIAOJane
Oct 22 2026

研究前沿|隨機對照研究證實,經皮耳迷走神經刺激能有效減輕肩關節鏡手術後的反彈性疼痛

簡介 神經阻滯消退時的疼痛 肩關節鏡手術後,疼痛起初可能控制良好,但隨著神經阻滯消退,疼痛可能突然加劇。這種由輕微疼痛轉為劇烈疼痛的過程稱為反彈痛,可能干擾休息與術後恢復。在阻滯作用逐漸減弱時維持穩定鎮痛,仍是圍手術期疼痛管理的重要挑戰。 2026年9月15日,Jun Zhang及其同事在《Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine》發表一項隨機、假刺激對照試驗,研究經皮耳部迷走神經刺激(taVNS)是否能降低肩關節鏡手術後反彈痛的發生率。 研究納入120名患者,將taVNS與假刺激,和常規麻醉及鎮痛方案進行比較。手術後24小時內,taVNS組較少出現反彈痛,部分恢復及睡眠指標也有所改善。然而,平均疼痛分數的下降幅度很小,兩組鎮痛藥使用量的差異未達統計學顯著。 背景 反彈痛管理的缺口 單次肌間溝臂叢神經阻滯(ISB)是肩部手術常用的區域鎮痛技術。局部麻醉劑作用於神經周圍,可提供約12至24小時的鎮痛,但藥效消退時,手術部位的疼痛可能迅速出現。因此,評估鎮痛策略時應單獨關注反彈痛:單日平均疼痛分數可能無法充分反映這種急劇而短暫的變化。 連續神經周圍導管及輔助藥物有助於處理這個問題,但也會增加操作、管理或藥物相關負擔。taVNS透過貼於耳部皮膚的電極刺激迷走神經耳支,為研究輔助鎮痛提供另一途徑。其給予方式不同於植入式迷走神經刺激、經皮頸部刺激及針刺式耳部神經調節。 過去研究曾探討耳部神經刺激對術後疼痛的影響,但針對單次ISB後反彈痛的證據仍有限。本試驗事先將反彈痛指定為主要終點,並在既有多模式鎮痛基礎上測試taVNS的附加效果。 方法 隨機比較與刺激方案 這項單中心試驗在中國浙江省德清縣人民醫院進行。在接受篩查的142人中,120名符合條件且安排接受肩關節鏡手術的患者按1:1隨機分組,每組60人。所有患者均完成追蹤,並納入意向治療分析。患者、結果評估者及資料分析人員均保持盲法;負責施加刺激的人員知道分組。 兩組均接受全身麻醉、一次性超聲引導ISB,以及標準化靜脈布洛芬和患者自控舒芬太尼鎮痛。ISB使用15毫升0.5%羅哌卡因。taVNS施加於左側耳甲艇,頻率30 Hz、脈衝寬度250 μs,刺激30秒、休息30秒交替進行。強度逐步提高,直到患者感到明顯麻刺感,再降低至患者確認無感覺的程度。首次治療在術前等候區開始,拔管後轉入麻醉後照護單位前持續進行。術後第1及第2天早上各進行一次2小時治療。假刺激組接受相同的電極放置及感覺閾值測試,但治療期間裝置輸出設定為零。 主要結果是手術後24小時內反彈痛的發生率。研究人員使用0至10分數字評分量表(NRS),將反彈痛定義為阻滯消退後疼痛由≤3升至≥7,且至少上升4分。阻滯消退是根據疼痛變化推定,並未透過連續感覺檢查確認。次要結果包括術後6、12、24及48小時的疼痛與舒芬太尼累積用量、恢復品質、睡眠品質及不良事件。主要結果採用卡方檢驗分析,重複測量的次要結果採用混合效應模型。恢復及睡眠分數的時間點比較進行Bonferroni校正。樣本量按主要終點估算;次要結果分析屬探索性質。 結果 主要終點與效果量...
發表者 Dr. XIAOJane
Oct 13 2026

2026 世界心理健康日:主題與有意義的行動

2026 世界心理健康日為 10 月 10 日星期六。世界衛生組織(WHO)與 World Federation for Mental Health(WFMH)公布的官方主題是「Lived experiences heard: real voices, real change」[1], [2]。今年的倡議重點,是傾聽具有心理健康相關親身經驗的人,並讓他們真正參與影響自身生活的決策、服務與政策。 個人、職場與社區都可以透過實際支持、自願參與的對話、心理健康倡議活動,以及在活動日之後持續進行的行動來參與。真正有意義的參與不需要大型活動,也不一定需要預算。2026 世界心理健康日的核心,是把「提高關注」與「傾聽」轉化為真正的參與及長期支持。 2026 世界心理健康日的主題是什麼? 2026 世界心理健康日的官方主題是「Lived...
發表者 Dr. XIAOJane
Oct 10 2026

Research Frontiers|33 萬人睡眠數據顯示:健康睡眠模式與較低失智症風險相關

中年睡眠與大腦健康 中年時期的睡眠習慣,和十多年後的失智症風險有什麼關係?一項超過 33 萬人的研究,同時分析多項睡眠特徵,包括每天的睡眠時間、頻繁失眠與白天嗜睡,評估這些特徵和日後失智症之間的關聯。 這項研究由 Tao Wei、Jie Chang 與同事進行,並於 2025 年 9 月 30 日發表在 Alzheimer's Research & Therapy。研究使用 UK Biobank 資料,參與者在納入研究時年齡為 40 至...
發表者 Dr. XIAOJane
Oct 10 2026